Register Now for our 2018 Annual Employee Ownership Conference

Are you an NCEO member? Learn more or sign up now.

Home » Columns »

ESOP Operational Issues

ESOP Diversification (Part One)

Nancy Dittmer

September 20, 2010

(Nancy Dittmer)The diversification rules that apply to closely held companies with ESOPs tend to generate many questions from ESOP sponsors. One reason for the questions is that there is some degree of uncertainty in how the rules are to be applied. The official guidance that we have from the IRS is a notice from 1988 (Notice 88-56), and this guidance does not address many of the uncertain issues. There has been much discussion of the diversification rules in the ESOP community recently, so it seems appropriate to review those rules here.

The theory behind the diversification requirement is simple. An ESOP is a retirement savings vehicle that is designed to be invested in company stock as opposed to a diversified portfolio of investments. As an employee nears retirement, these rules allow him or her to diversify at least a portion of his or her account out of the company stock and into such diversified investments.

In very general terms, the Internal Revenue Code provides that an ESOP participant who has 10 years of participation in the ESOP and who has attained age 55 must be able to elect to diversify 25% of the balance in his or her company stock account. This election must be provided annually for 5 years after the participant meets both the service and age requirements. So if a participant is age 55 but has not completed 10 years of participation until he or she attains age 57, then the 5-year period for this person will be from ages 57-61. Then in the 6th year, the participant can elect to diversify 50% of his or her company stock balance. Then, unless the ESOP document includes more liberal diversification provisions, the diversification election period ends.

The diversification calculations are cumulative, so prior-year elections are factored into the current-year calculation. Again, in very general terms, the cumulative nature of the calculations is illustrated by the following example:

Shares as of 12/31/2009170
Shares previously diversified 50
25%X 25%
Less shares previously diversified(50)
Shares eligible to be diversified for 20095
The participant's election to diversify can be satisfied in one of the following manners:

Much of the uncertainty in applying these diversification rules relate to the following questions:

I will explore these issues in future columns.

Author biography and other columns in this series

PrintEmail this page

PrintPrinter-friendly version