Supreme Court Hears Case on Standing of Individual Plan Participants

In an important case, the Supreme Court has started hearing arguments in a case concerning the standing of individual participants in a defined contribution retirement plan to sue for denied benefits rather than having to sue on behalf of the entire plan. The case, James LaRue v.

Supreme Court Hears Oral Arguments on Presumption of Prudence

On April 2, the Supreme Court heard arguments in Fifth Third Bancorp v. Dudenhoeffer, U.S., No. 12-751, concerning the so-called Moench presumption, which has been adopted by several circuit courts and is often used as a basis to dismiss stock-drop suits.

Supreme Court Likely to Hear ESOP Indemnification Case

On January 9, the Supreme Court invited the solicitor general to file a brief in a case regarding ESOPs, indicating the Court's interest in hearing the case. The case concerns whether ERISA permits courts to order one fiduciary to indemnify another. In the case, Fenkell v.

Supreme Court Rules on ESOP Case

On June 25, the Supreme Court ruled in Fifth Third Bancorp v. Dudenhoeffer that there is no presumption of prudence to protect fiduciaries of plans designed to invest in company stock, and specifically employee stock ownership plans (ESOPs).