Skip to content

Employee Ownership Legal Digest (2) Archive

Stay informed on the latest legal developments impacting employee ownership. This page provides timely and concise summaries of key cases and rulings, contributed by experienced attorneys, to help the entire employee ownership community understand their implications, and also offers access to NCEO's archive of prior content.



Corey Rosen

Settlement Reached in Morton Buildings Case

In Lysengen v. Argent Trust, et al., No. 1:20-cv-01177MMM-JEH (D.C. Ill. May 9, 2025), a court approved a $4 million settlement in a lawsuit over a 50% drop in the value of Morton Buildings in the year following the company’s taking on debt to fund the ESOP. The plan initially owned a minority of the shares in the company.


Corey Rosen

ESOP Valuation Case Can Proceed

In Ramirez et. al. v. AMPAM Parks Mech., Inc., No. EDCV 24-1038-KK-DTBx (C.D. Cal. Feb. 14, 2025), employees moved forward with most of their claims against AMPAM Parks Mechanical and the plan’s trustee. The lawsuit alleges the company’s ESOP overpaid for the stock, which was sold for a depressed price.





Corey Rosen

Final Court Approval for Settlement Casino Queen Case

In Hensiek v. Bd. of Dirs. of Casino Queen Holding Co., 20-cv-377-DWD (S.D. Ill. Feb. 25, 2025), employees of Illinois-based Casino Queen Inc. received final court approval for a $7.1 million settlement resolving litigation over the company’s employee stock ownership plan.


Corey Rosen

Rules Decisively Against DOL in Common Interest Case

In Harrison v. Envision Management, No. 21–cv–00304–CNS–MD (D.C. Colo. Jan. 13, 2025), a court confirmed a magistrate’s earlier ruling against the Department of Labor (DOL) in a case in which the plaintiff’s law firm received information from the DOL under a common interest agreement, even though the DOL was not a party to the suit.


Corey Rosen

Class Certified in Envision Holdings ESOP Valuation Case

In Harrison v. Envision Management Holding Company, No. 22-1098 (D.C. Colo. Jan. 25, 2025), a district court certified a class in an ESOP valuation case. The plaintiff had alleged that the ESOP overpaid for the shares. The plan contained an arbitration clause, which Envision sought to enforce.


Your Cart Is Empty

Add a membership, publication or research material to get started.