Stay informed on the latest legal developments impacting employee ownership with timely and concise summaries of key cases and rulings. Learn more about this digest »
Corey Rosen
In Lysengen v. Argent Trust, et al., No. 1:20-cv-01177MMM-JEH (D.C. Ill. May 9, 2025), a court approved a $4 million settlement in a lawsuit over a 50% drop in the value of Morton Buildings in the year following the company’s taking on debt to fund the ESOP. The plan initially owned a minority of the shares in the company.
Corey Rosen
Employees challenge AMPAM ESOP sale, alleging overpayment and management control of the trustee. Court allows most claims to proceed.
Corey Rosen
In Dalton v. Freeman, No. 2:22-cv-00847-DJC-DB (E.D. Cal. Mar. 24, 2025), a court ruled plaintiffs had not pled a specific enough case against Alerus, which was acting as a trustee at O.C. Communications when the ESOP company was sold.
Corey Rosen
In Solid Ground Transportation v. Commissioner, No. 24-1184 (Mar. 18, 2025), the 7th Circuit dismissed a petition from Solid Grant Transportation over the potential disqualification of its ESOP. The company received a letter from an IRS agent with questions about its plan from 2013 to 2018.
Corey Rosen
In Schultz v. Aerotech, Inc., No. 24-618 (W.D. Pa. Feb. 20, 2025), a court allowed a case to proceed over how an ESOP company invested cash in the trust. Plaintiffs allege the cash was too conservatively invested.
Corey Rosen
In Hensiek v. Bd. of Dirs. of Casino Queen Holding Co., 20-cv-377-DWD (S.D. Ill. Feb. 25, 2025), employees of Illinois-based Casino Queen Inc. received final court approval for a $7.1 million settlement resolving litigation over the company’s employee stock ownership plan.
Corey Rosen
In Harrison v. Envision Management, a court confirmed a magistrate’s earlier ruling against the Department of Labor (DOL) in a case in which the plaintiff’s law firm received information from the DOL under a common interest agreement, even though the DOL was not a party to the suit.
Corey Rosen
In Harrison v. Envision Management Holding Company, No. 22-1098 (D.C. Colo. Jan. 25, 2025), a district court certified a class in an ESOP valuation case. The plaintiff had alleged that the ESOP overpaid for the shares. The plan contained an arbitration clause, which Envision sought to enforce.
Corey Rosen
In Colon v. Johnson, No. 8:22-cv-00888-TPB-TGW (Dec. 17, 2024), a $19 million settlement was given final approval in a case alleging diversion of assets in an ESOP company.
Corey Rosen
In Su v. Peterson et al., No. 4:19-cv-00705 (E.D. Tex. Jan. 8, 2025), parties reached a $14 million settlement in a case involving the sale of an ESOP company. The plaintiffs alleged a trustee for the company, which operated as All My Sons Moving & Storage, allowed a sale of the assets of the ESOP trust back to the company at a price that was below what the stock was worth.
